New paper from Trondheim’s INLA group (arXiv)

Martins, Simpson, Lindgren and Rue

The INLA approach for approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models has been shown to give fast and accurate estimates of posterior marginals and also to be a valuable tool in practice via the R-package R-INLA. In this paper we formalize new developments in the R-INLA package and show how these features greatly extend the scope of models that can be analyzed by this interface. We also discuss the current default method in R-INLA to approximate posterior marginals of the hyperparameters using only a modest number of evaluations of the joint posterior distribution of the hyperparameters, without any need for numerical integration.

I’m using R-INLA for two UPTECH papers at the moment and I’m really interested in the replication functionality in 3.2 and the Kronecker functionality in 3.6, which seems to be a more “official” version of the work I’ve been doing rolling my own precision matrices for use with the generic0 model class.

R-INLA is definitely a worthwhile piece of software to learn to use and the stochastic PDE model for spatial inference is one of the coolest things I’ve seen in terms of spatial modelling. I wonder if the Kronecker stuff in 3.6 will let me define a separable product of a stochastic PDE model and a model for the time series component.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s